3rd
International Electron
Capture and Transfer Dissociation In Mass Spectrometry -
Fundamentals and Applications 6-9 December 2005 Salish
Lodge and Spa Hosted By University of Department of Medicinal Chemistry |
Date |
Time |
Session |
Type |
Contact Name |
Venue |
Tues,
Dec 6
|
09:00 – 19:00 |
Conference
Registration, Room Check-in |
Pre-conference |
Hotel:
425-888-2556 Conf:
206-369-5958 |
Lobby |
19:30 – 19:45 |
Symposium
Welcome |
Reception |
David
Goodlett |
Falls Terrace |
|
19:45 – 20:30 |
“The odd
electrons are back - and life is exciting again!" |
Keynote
Address |
Cathy
Costello |
Falls Terrace |
|
19:00 – 23:00 |
Reception Social and Hors d'oeuvres |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Falls Terrace |
|
23:00 – |
Casual
Gathering |
Social |
|
Hospitality Suite |
Date |
Time |
Session |
Type |
Contact Name |
Venue |
Wed,
Dec 7
|
08:00 – 10:45 |
Breakfast |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Salish Ballroom |
|
Morning Presentations and Discussions
|
|
Moderator: Evan
Williams |
Salish Ballroom |
|
09:00 – 09:45 |
"New Mass
Spectrometry Technology and Applications in the Study of Cell Migration, the
Histone Code, and Cancer Vaccine Development" |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Donald Hunt |
Salish Ballroom |
|
09:45 – 10:15 |
"Towards an
Understanding of Electron Transfer Dissociation." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Sharon Pitteri |
Salish Ballroom |
|
10:15 – 10:45 |
“Electron Capture
Dissociation in a linear RFQ ion trap.” |
Presentation and Discussion |
Takashi Baba Central Research
Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd. |
Salish Ballroom |
|
10:45 – 11:00 |
Break |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Salish Ballroom |
|
|
Morning Presentations and Discussions
|
|
Moderator: Evan
Williams |
Salish Ballroom |
|
11:00 – 11:30 |
"Charge-reduced
arginine, lysine, and histidine residues. Structures and energetics." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Frank Turecek |
Salish Ballroom |
|
11:30 – 12:00 |
"The Electron
Transfer Event in Electron Transfer Dissociation." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Jack Simons |
Salish Ballroom |
Date |
Time |
Session |
Type |
Contact Name |
Venue |
Wed,
Dec 7
|
12:00 – 12:30 |
“Simulations on
supercomputer ion dynamics in FT ICR cell in the presence of electrons on the
cell axis (ECD case)” |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Evgenij Nikolaev Institute for |
Salish Ballroom |
12:30 – 13:00 |
"The Role of Free
Radical Rearrangements in Electron Capture Dissociation." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Peter O'Connor |
Salish Ballroom |
|
13:00 – 14:00 |
Lunch |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Salish Ballroom |
|
|
Afternoon Presentations and Discussions
|
|
Moderator: Frank Turecek |
Salish Ballroom |
|
14:00 – 14:30 |
"Effects of
Molecular Conformation on ECD." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Evan Williams |
Salish Ballroom |
|
14:30 – 15:00 |
“Charge Localization
and Backbone Bond Strength Modulation in Peptide Cations Studied by Electron
Capture Dissociation.” |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Frank Kjeldsen |
Salish Ballroom |
|
15:00 – 15:30 |
"Evolution and
revolution in ECD FT-ICR MS implementation." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Yury Tsybin National High Magnetic
Field |
Salish Ballroom |
|
15:30 – 16:00 |
"Predicting
fragment abundances in ECD: from full understanding to total confusion and
back." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Roman Zubarev |
Salish Ballroom |
Date |
Time |
Session |
Type |
Contact Name |
Venue |
Wed,
Dec 7
|
16:00 – 16:30 |
Break |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Falls Terrace |
|
Afternoon Presentations and Discussions
Cont’d
|
|
Moderator: David Goodlett |
Falls Terrace |
|
16:30 – 17:00 |
“Combination of ergodic
and non-ergodic ion activation, a new approach for PTM-peptide
Identification.” |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Catherine Stacey Bruker Daltonics Inc, |
Falls Terrace |
|
17:00 – 17:30 |
"nanoLC Fraction
Analysis by Chip-Based Nanoelectrospray for Improved Glycopeptide
Characterization." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Gary Williams Advion BioSystems |
Falls Terrace |
|
17:30– 18:00 |
"Finnigan LTQ FT;
ECD and Progress" |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Stevan Horning Thermo Electron |
Falls Terrace |
|
18:00 – 18:30 |
Break |
Free time |
|
|
|
18:30 – 21:00 |
Poster Session (Vintage Room) and Beer Tasting |
Beverages |
Sponsored by Advion |
Falls Terrace |
|
19:00 – 23:00 |
Hors d'oeuvres |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Falls Terrace |
|
23:00 – |
Casual
Gathering |
Social |
|
Hospitality Suite |
Date |
Time |
Session |
Type |
Contact Name |
Venue |
Thur, Dec 8
|
08:30
-11:00 |
Breakfast |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Salish Ballroom |
|
Morning Presentations and Discussions
|
|
Moderator: Jon Amster |
Salish Ballroom |
|
10:00
-10:30 |
“Bioconjugates for
Tunable Peptide Fragmentation: Free
Radical Initiated Peptide Sequencing (FRIPS).” |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Jack Beauchamp California Institute of
|
Salish Ballroom |
|
10:30
-11:00 |
"Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptides Metalated
with Alkaline Earth Metal Ions." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Dominic Chan The Chinese |
Salish Ballroom |
|
11:00 -11:30 |
" Electron-Promoted
Ion Coherence -Enhancement of ECD and LC/MS Sensitivity." |
Presentation and Discussion |
James Bruce |
Salish Ballroom |
|
11:30
-12:00 |
“Disruption of
non-covalent bonds in large multimeric protein complexes with ECD.” |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Ron Heeren |
Salish Ballroom |
|
12:00 – 13:00 |
Lunch |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Salish Ballroom |
|
|
Afternoon Presentations and Discussions
|
|
Roman Zubarev |
Salish Ballroom |
|
13:00
-13:30 |
[To Be Announced] |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Jasna Peter-Katalinic |
Salish Ballroom |
Date |
Time |
Session |
Type |
Contact Name |
Venue |
Thur, Dec 8
|
13:30
-14:00 |
“Electron capture
dissociation FT-ICR mass spectrometry of proteins involved in signal
transduction.” |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Helen Cooper |
Salish Ballroom |
14:00
-14:30 |
"ECD of Sulfated
Glycosaminoglycans - A Tool for Determining the Sites of Sulfation." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Jon Amster |
Salish Ballroom |
|
14:30
-15:00 |
"Electron Capture
Dissociation of Triply Charged Peptides Carrying a Proton and a Divalent
Metal Cation." |
Presentation and
Discussion |
Kristina Hakansson |
Salish Ballroom |
|
15:00 – 15:30 |
Break |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Vintage Room |
|
15:30 – 18:00 |
Poster
Session |
Presentation |
|
Vintage Room |
|
18:00 -19:00 |
Break |
Free time |
|
|
|
19:00 – 23:00 |
Dinner and Social |
Food and
Beverages |
|
Falls Terrace |
|
|
"ECD - Controversy
Helps Its Future" |
Closing Remarks |
Fred McLafferty |
Falls Terrace |
|
23:00 – |
Casual
Gathering |
Social |
|
Hospitality Suite |
Date |
Time |
Session |
Venue |
Dec 7-8 |
09:00-21:00 |
Poster Viewing |
Vintage Room |
Dec 6-9 |
09:00-17:00 |
Hotel Computer Room |
Hotel Administrative Office |
Dec 6-9 |
24 hours |
Wireless Internet (802.11b, WiFi) |
Passwords Available at Hotel Front Desk |
Hotel Information:
Salish Lodge and Spa
(425) 888-2556
http://www.salishlodge.com/
Conference Hotline:
206-369-5958 (For conference specific concerns and emergencies)
Sponsors:
We thank each of the following organizations that have provided monetary sponsorship to make this conference possible. Our sincerest thanks go to:
UW School of Pharmacy Mass Spectrometry Facility
UW Department of Medicinal Chemistry
Thermo Electron
Bruker Daltonics
IonSpec
Advion
Amgen
LOCAL
RESTAURANTS Snoqualmie, |
|
425-391-9597 |
La Fogata 425-888-7755 |
Colonial Inn 425-222-5191 |
Lombardi’s Cucina 425-391-9090 |
Cucina! Cucina! Italian
Café 425-391-3800 |
Nicolino Italiano 425-391-8077 |
El Caporal Mexican
Restaurant 425-888-2048 |
North Bend Bar & Grill 425-888-1243 |
Gordy’s Steak & BBQ
Smokehouse 425-831-2433 |
Robertiello’s Italiano
Restaurante 425-888-1803 |
Himitsu Japanese
Restaurant 425-396-7550 |
425-888-6060 |
Ixtapa Carnation, WA 425-333-6788 |
Sushi Man 425-391-4295 |
Jak’s Grill 425-837-8834 |
Uncle Si’s Pizza 425-396-7975 |
La Costa Mexican 425-392-8980 |
Wildflower Restaurant 425-88-9399 |
Abstracts
SYMPOSIUM ABSTRACTS
3rd International
Electron Capture and Transfer Dissociation in Mass Spectrometry - Fundamentals and Applications
In order of the presenting author
Jens Ulrik Andersen,
Dept. Physics and Astronomy,
We have developed a method for electron transfer to molecular ions from in fast collisions with Na atoms in a metal vapor cell. This technique has been applied to produce gas-phase dianions of fullerenes and also to study electron-transfer dissociation (ETD) for biomolecular ions. The decay dynamics after electron transfer to ions produced by electrospray can be followed on a millisecond time scale in a small electrostatic storage ring, ELISA, and near-infrared spectroscopy on C60 dianions will be discussed as an example. Cross sections for ETD of small peptides have been measured at a 100 kV accelerator to elucidate the ETD mechanism. We have found that the survival of intact charge-reduced ions on a microsecond time scale depends strongly on H-bonding interactions. Furthermore, the yield of N-Ca bond breakage is independent of the size of the peptide, from three to ten amino acid residues. The implications for the mechanism at play will be discussed.
[Poster No.2]
Takashi Baba,
Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd.
We demonstrated Electron Capture Dissociation in a linear radio-frequency-quadrupole (RFQ) ion trap last year1). The issue for realizing ECD in the RF ion trap was how to avoid RF heating and to provide low energy electrons in the trap since ECD requires low energy electrons of less than several eV. In the demonstration, electrons were introduced by a magnetic field against to the RF electric field and peptide ions were successfully dissociated by the electrons. The reaction speed in our first demonstration, which was presented at the last symposium, was several % per 80 ms because of poor electron injection efficiency. The data accumulation was 600 sec because of poor ion accumulation efficiency by strong perturbation by electron beam, so that the ECD reaction cell was difficult to apply to high throughput analysis for proteomics.
In this paper, we show our recent progresses of ECD instrumentation using a combined linear RFQ ion trap. We developed a new T-shaped ECD reaction cell, where the electron beam path and ion beam path were physically separated. This modification provided efficient electron and ion transmission. We obtained HOT ECD spectra (electron kinetic energy of 5.6 eV) of doubly protonated substance P by 5 sec data accumulation with reaction rate of higher than 30%. Because our ECD cell is coupled to a TOF mass spectrometer, which has high mass resolution with high speed mass analysis, the system will be applicable for high throughput proteomics including post translational modification analysis.
1)T. Baba et al. Anal. Chem. 76, 4263(2004)
Bioconjugates for
Tunable Peptide Fragmentation: Free
Radical Initiated Peptide Sequencing (FRIPS)
J. L. (Jack) Beauchamp,
California Institute of Technology
Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
We have developed a new method to achieve controlled fragmentation of peptides and proteins, referred to as free radical initiated peptide sequencing or FRIPS. In our initial studies, the azo free radical initiator Vazo 68 is coupled to a peptide or protein and the bioconjugates is examined using electrospray ionization and either an ion trap or FT-ICR mass spectrometer for MS/MS analysis. On collisional activation, the Vazo 68-peptide conjugate generates a free radical, which can be further activated to cleave the peptide backbone. Mostly z-type fragments are formed, as in CAD of other radical peptides and ECD fragmentation, and phosphorylation sites are preserved. Examination of a range of model peptides provides insights into the mechanism of backbone cleavage, and allows a detailed comparison between FRIPS and ECD. With new free radical reagents, the FRIPS methodology can be extended not only for the specific application of peptide and protein sequencing, but for studies of the free radical chemistry of proteins.
Reference
Bioconjugates for Tunable Peptide Fragmentation: Free Radical Initiated Peptide Sequencing (FRIPS). Robert Hodyss, Heather A. Cox, and J.L. Beauchamp, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 12436-12437 (2005)
Electron capture
dissociation FT-ICR mass spectrometry of proteins involved in signal
transduction
Helen J. Cooper1, Shiva Akbarzadeh1, John K. Heath1, Michael H. Tatham2 and Ronald T. Hay2
1.
2. Centre of Biomolecular Sciences,
Full insight into signalling processes requires identification of signalling proteins and their partners, and characterization of any post-translational modifications. We have applied electron capture dissociation FT-ICR mass spectrometry to characterise signalling proteins including ROR2, a protein implicated in bone cell growth and differentiation, and it partners, and SUMOylated proteins isolated from HeLa cells.
The attachment of the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO to target proteins is involved in a number of important cellular processes. SUMO modification of proteins results in substrate–specific functions, e.g., targeting of protein RanGAP1 to the nuclear pore complex and activation of transcription factor p53. We have applied FT-ICR mass spectrometry, together with CID, ECD and IRMPD, to identify and characterize SUMOylated proteins isolated from HeLa cells.
ROR2 is a tyrosine kinase transmembrane receptor protein involved in the early formation of chondrocytes. Defects in ROR2 result in skeletal dysplasia including general limb shortening, spine defects and brachydactyly. Here, we demonstrate incorporation of ECD into a high-throughput data-dependent LC MS/MS approach for the analysis of Fc-ROR2 isolated from chondrocytes. The results demonstrate the suitability of ECD as an integral technique in high-throughput proteomic strategies.
Haichuan Liu and Kristina
Håkansson,
Department of Chemistry,
Divalent metal cations play
crucial roles in many biological processes, e.g. by being essential components
in catalysis and by stabilizing biomolecular structures. Electron capture dissociation (ECD) has been
applied to the characterization of model protein EF-hands and zinc fingers
bound to metal dications, resulting mainly in ECD fragmentation close to the
chelating residues [1]. Chan and
co-workers recently investigated ECD of model peptide-metal dication complexes
and found that the fragmentation patterns are strongly dependent on the type of
metal dication. Here, we present ECD of
triply charged model peptides carrying an additional proton compared to the
studies by Chan et al. The latter
feature allows detection of a larger number of product ions, yielding more
conclusive information.
All experiments were
performed with a 7 T Q-FT-ICR mass spectrometer (APEX-Q, Bruker Daltonics,
For Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, Ba2+,
Mn2+, Fe2+, and Zn2+ adducted to substance P (H-RPKPQQFFGLM-NH2), major ECD
products are singly charged c’ (the “prime” symbolizes the additional hydrogen
observed in c ions from protonated species [2]) and singly charged metal
(M)-containing [z - H] ions. The latter
ions lack one hydrogen compared to z ions observed from protonated species
(after taking into account the mass of the metal). We believe these product ions are best
explained within the mechanisms recently proposed by Syrstad and Turecek [3]
and Simons et al. [4], which depict electron capture at the peptide backbone
followed by proton transfer. In our
experiments with substance P, the ionizing proton is located at the N-terminal
Arg (highest proton affinity). We
believe this proton remains at Arg and is not involved in the fragmentation
process because an N-terminal ionizing proton is required for the observation
of singly charged c’ ions. The
additional proton is transferred from the C-terminal part of the peptide,
explaining the lack of one hydrogen and one charge for singly charged [z + M -
H] ions (the metal is assumed to remain doubly charged, thus, the [z + M - H]
ions should be radical zwitterions). We
also observe doubly charged metal-containing c’ and c ions. Those ion types are also consistent with the
mechanisms above if the transferred proton originates from within the c-type
fragment and the metal ion acts solely as a charge carrier. These hypotheses are supported by the fact
that a likely source for the transferred proton is the alpha carbon of the
amino acid to which the metal ion is coordinated (expected to be close to the
C-terminus due to Coulomb repulsion and amino acid composition). That carbon
becomes more acidic upon metal ion binding [3].
The relative abundance of the different product ions vary with the type
of metal ion and seems to correlate with metal ion size.
For Co2+ and Ni2+, the
fragmentation patterns are completely different from the ones discussed
above. Here, mainly small molecule
losses originating from the peptide C-terminus and C-terminal Met residue are
observed. These results correlate well
with the higher difference between first and second ionization energy (DIE) for
these metals (9.2 and 10.5 eV, respectively, compared to 5.3-8.3 eV for the
other metals investigated). Thus, more
energy is gained via electron capture at the metal rather than the peptide
backbone, resulting in cleavage at the metal site rather than the
backbone. For Ni2+, which has the
highest DIE, no c and z type ions are observed.
1. Kellersberger K; Fabris D. 52nd ASMS Conference,
2. Kjeldsen F; Haselmann KF; Budnik BA; Jensen F; Zubarev
RA. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002;356:201.
3. Syrstad EA; Turecek F. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.
2005;16:208.
4. Sobczyk M; Anusiewicz W; Berdys-Kochanska J; Sawicka A;
Skurski P; Simons J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005;109:250.
[Poster No.8]
Disruption of
non-covalent bonds in large multimeric protein complexes with ECD.
Rimco B.J. Geels1, Esther van Duijn2, R. Mihalca1, M.C. Duursma1 S.M. van der Vies3, A.J.R. Heck2 and Ron M.A. Heeren1,2
1 FOM-Institute
for Atomic and Molecular Physics, Kruislaan 407, 1098 SJ
2 Department of Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Sorbonnelaan 16, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands
3 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Electron capture dissociation, SORI-CID and IRMPD are employed in various combinations for structural analysis of a variety of biomolecules. We have designed a novel IRMPD probe was designed that allows combined ECD, SORI and IRMPD with a large area electron emitter. It has been used to investigate the use of ECD to study large, non-covalently bound protein complexes. Electron capture induced dissociation (ECD) experiments of proteins in FT-ICR mass spectrometry normally leads to charge reduction and backbone bond cleavages, largely retaining labile non-covalent interactions. We have performed an ECD experiment on the 84 kDa non-covalent heptameric complex of gp31. The results were evaluated and compared with sustained off-resonance irradiation collisionally activated dissociation (SORI-CAD) experiments. Unexpectedly, using ECD the gp31 oligomer shows as main pathway dissociation into a hexamer and monomer, disrupting labile, non-covalent bonds just as in SORI-CAD. However, the charge separation between the two products is unusual; it is highly symmetric with respect to molecular weight. This indicates that a major charge redistribution does not take place in ECD, contrary to findings with SORI-CAD. From, this it is hypothesized that in the ECD process the ejected monomer will retain more of its original structure. A comparison with a structurally similar protein, GroES reveals a distinctly different behavior. There, electron irradiation leads to non-dissociative charge reduction.
Frank Kjeldsen, Oleg A.
Silivra, Mikhail M. Savitski, Christopher M. Adams and Roman A. Zubarev
Laboratory for Biological and
Medical Mass Spectrometry,
Charge solvation and hydrogen
bonding in polypeptide ions determine their three-dimensional structure in the
gas phase. Information on the charge localization is critical for molecular
modeling as different charge configurations can result in different low-energy
structures. Charge location is difficult to predict by simple inspection of the
amino acid sequences, since the basicities of residues are influenced by charge
solvation (depending upon the secondary and tertiary structures) as well as
nearby charges. Similarly, charge localization by experimental means can also
be difficult as fragmentation techniques utilizing vibrational excitation (VE)
often scramble protons and erase information about their initial location. ECD
introduces minimum VE and thus may reveal charged sites in polypeptide
ions. Here we studied with ECD charge
localization in several common polypeptides ions, and compare the results with
collision-activated dissociation (CAD).
Even with a large data set
(ca. doubly-charged 3000 peptides), no inconsistency was found with the
assumption that charge neutralization in ECD is favored at the
highest-recombination-energy site, which is the one with the lowest basicity.
Thus it was generally possible to locate with ECD (n-1) charges for n+
precursor ions, although not always to a single residue. CAD of the same
peptide ions could potentially locate all n+ charges, but CAD data lacked
self-consistency and showed evidence of proton rearrangement before
fragmentation, especially for N-terminal b-ions and for higher charge states.
For shorter peptide ions (bradykinin and neurotensin), the charge assignments
were largely in agreement with the intrinsic gas-phase basicity of the
respective amino acid residues. For larger ions (melittin and villin head group
domain) in higher charge states, ECD revealed the charging at both
intrinsically basic as well as at less basic residues, which was attributed to
charge sharing with other groups due to the presence of secondary and higher
order structures. Interestingly, ECD of villin
(MLSDEDFKAVFGMTRSAFANLPLWKQ-QNLKKEKGLF) suggested possible deprotonation of E32.
UVPD of the y152+ fragment supported this assignment and suggested 1:6 ratio
between deprotonation at E32 and the C-terminus, respectively.
For lower charge states of
polypeptides, charge localization by ECD was complicated by limited
fragmentation. To overcome this problem, we introduced a weak link in the
polypeptide backbone. Calculations showed that, in radical ECD intermediates,
the O-Ca bond is by ~70 kJ/mol weaker than the N-Cα bond. Thus a technique
was designed of substituting during F-moc polypeptide synthesis the amide
peptide bond –CO-
Several peptides containing
the ester backbone linkage (“F-link”) were synthesized and fragmented by both
CAD and ECD. ECD of substance P 2+ ions with the F-link between F8 and G9 gave
“c´” and z∙ ions, with “c´” ions being of the R-CO-OH type, i.e.
N-terminal truncated peptides. The cleavage frequency of the O-Cα bond was
twice of the corresponding N-Cα bond in native substance P. At the same
time, adjacent to the F-link N-Cα cleavages were reduced by 30% on
average. CAD of F-linked ions confirmed the CO-O bond to be much more labile that
the amide bond. This and other results on F-link containing peptides will be
presented. Implications will be discussed for the ECD mechanism and for
determination of gas-phase polypeptide structures.
Iwona Anusiewicz, Piotr Skurski, and Jack Simons*
Department of Chemistry and
We have made use of classical dynamics trajectory simultions and ab initio electronic structure calculations to estimate the cross-sections with which electrons are transferred (in ETD) to model systems containing both an S-S bond that is cleaved and a –NH3+ positively charged site or containing an peptide linkage and a –NH3+ site. We used a Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg curve-crossing approximation to estimate the ETD rates for electron transfer from a CH3- anion to the –NH3+ Rydberg orbital or the S-S s* or OCN p* orbital. We predict the cross-section for ETD at the positive site of our model compound to be an order of magnitude larger than for transfer to the Coulomb-stabilized SS or OCN bond sites. These results seem to suggest that attachment to positive sites should dominate in producing bond cleavage. However, we also note that cleavage induced by capture at the positive site will be diminished by an amount related to the distance from the positive site to the SS or OCN bonds. This dimunition can render cleavage through Coulomb-assisted bond-site attachment competitive for our model compound. Implications for ECD and ETD of peptides and proteins in which SS or N-Ca bonds are cleaved are also discussed and we explain that such events are most likely susceptible to Coulomb-assisted attachment because the S-S s* and C=O p* orbitals are the lowest-lying antibonding orbitals in most peptides and proteins.
Combination of ergodic and non-ergodic ion activation, a new approach for PTM-peptide Identification
Catherine Stacey; Andreas Brekenfeld; Thorsten Ledertheil; Markus Lubeck; Carsten Baessmann; Ralf Hartmer Bruker Daltonics Inc, Billerica, MA, USA & Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany
Introduction
Reversible phosphorylation is known to be one of the most common post-translational modifications (PTM) of proteins in eukaryotic cells, where the site of phosphorylation is essential to regulate key cellular processes, such as signal transduction. However, identification of PTM is technically challenging, because sensitive detection method are needed, that are capable of identifing post-translationally modified peptides even at a low level. In addition, amino acid phosphorylation is known to be weakly bonded and usually does not survive ion activation by collision-induced dissociation (CID). We will present a non-linear Paul trap offering structure analysis by a combination of CID and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) which is known to be particularly suitable for phosphorylation identification due to its non-ergodic nature
Methods
A Bruker HCTUltra ion trap instrument has been enhanced to enable the use of two separate non-redundant fragmentation techniques. Ergodic ion activation is achieved within the ion trap by conventional collision-induced dissociation (CID) of resonant excited parent ions. Non-ergodic dissociation is accomplished via electron transfer reaction. For the latter fragmentation method, an excess of odd-electron radical ions, generated in a negative chemical ionization source, are added to multiply charged peptide cations, previously isolated in the ion trap. Enhancement of the instrument control software allows data dependent fragmentation utilizing CID and/or ETD.
Preliminary results
ETD and CID fragmentation spectra of different synthetic and tryptic phosphopeptides have been acquired. Comparison of the resulting data shows the benefits of the non-ergodic ETD, where dephosphorylation of the parent ion was not observed, compared with CID, where phosphate loss is the most abundant signal. Another feature of the present approach is the possibility of combining both fragmentation methods within one acquisition cycle via appropriate application of ergodic and non-ergodic ion activation. Improved fragmentation data were obtained, enabling determination of the phosphorylation site without any prior sequence information.
In order to extend the application of the new approach, the fragmentation of glycosylated peptides and larger peptides above 2000Da is also described.
Can ECD / ETD help to identify site-specific metallation of
proteins?
Stefan Weidt, Vivienne Munk,
SIRCAMS and
S.K.Weidt@sms.ed.ac.uk
Cisplatin,
cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), is a widely used anti-cancer drug. The
mechanism of action has been attributed to the formation of DNA adducts,
disrupting the DNA repair mechanism, leading to cell death. Intriguingly, the
isomer transplatin does not display cytotoxic activity [1]. We are interested
in the differences between protein platination by the cis and the trans isomers
which may be related to biological activity. Previous studies have shown
cis- and transplatin form adducts with proteins such as ubiquitin [2] and
transferrin [3]. These studies have postulated possible platinum binding sites using
chemical blocking of a particular residue [2] or trypsin digestion followed by
MS / MS of the peptide fragments [3].
ECD / ETD have been shown to be
extremely powerful techniques for identification of post-translational
modifications. We are interested in utilising these techniques in direct
identification of the metallation sites in proteins, and to probe their
structural characteristics
We have begun to investigate the
relative merits of ECD and / or ETD versus CID / IRMPD to structurally characterise
these modifications, and answer the question can ECD / ETD be used to identify
the binding sites for metallo-drugs?
[1] E. R. Jamieson and S. J.
Lippard, Chem. Rev., 99, 2467-2498, 1999.
[2] T. Peleg-Shulman, Y. Najajreh,
and D. Gibson, J. Inorg. Biochem., 91, 306-311, 2002.
[3] I. Khalaila, C. S. Allardyce,
C. S. Verma, and P. J. Dyson, Chembiochem, 6, 1788-1795, 2005
[Poster No.13]
Ultra-Low Volume Fraction Collection from NanoLC Columns for Improved Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Protein Phosphorylation and Glycosylation
Colleen K. Van Pelt, Thomas N. Corso, Jie Li, Celeste Ptak, and Xian Huang
NanoLC with 75µm id columns and flow rates of 200 nL/min is gaining in popularity due to improved resolution, lower sample injection requirements, and better ionization efficiency leading to improved sensitivity. NanoLC peaks typically elute within 20 sec, providing most modern mass spectrometers sufficient time to perform MS/MS for simple protein ID experiments. However, for complex samples, such as glycopeptides where tandem MS experiments may be needed, nanoLC does not provide adequate analysis time. Here, we demonstrate a novel system capable of collecting ultra low volume fractions from 75 µm id nanoLC columns followed by subsequent nanoelectropray infusion analysis for increased data content via mass spectrometry, referred to as nano Fraction Analysis Chip Technology (nanoFACT). Fractions from a nanoLC column are collected into custom pipette tips, whose inner surface had been chemically modified to minimize peptide adsorption. These 200 nL fractions are collected every 60 sec from a column flowing at 200 nL/min with a 30 min gradient in an automated fashion using a robotic nanoelectrospray system (TriVersa NanoMate). The nanoLC fractions in the pipette tips dry naturally within several minutes in such a way as to create a concentrated band at the very end of the interior of the pipette tip. Following fraction collection the residue in each tip is reconstituted in 200 nL. The sample is analyzed directly from the tip with chip-based nanoelectrospray. The chip has 2 µm id nozzles, producing flow rates of 20 nL/min and providing 10 min of analysis time per fraction. Fraction collection, reconstitution and analysis steps are fully automated. This increase in analysis time allows for signal averaging resulting in higher data quality, collision energy optimization, slower scanning techniques to be used such as neutral loss and precursor ion scanning, higher resolution scans on FTMS instruments, and improved peptide quantitation. Furthermore, as the chromatography and reconstitution solvent are independent, the reconstitution solvent can be selected to maximize ionization efficiency without compromising chromatography. Here the advantages of nanoFACT are shown for phosphorylation analysis using bovine fetuin and glycosylation analysis using bovine ribonuclease B (RNase B). In the phosphorylation analysis, a comparison between conventional nanoLC and a nanoFACT analysis was performed. An MS/MS spectrum of a triply phosphorylated peptide, 313-HTFSGVApSVEpSpSGEAFHVGK-333 could only be obtained using nanoFACT and not with nanoLC. Furthermore spectra quality for the nanoFACT analysis was significantly improved over nanoLC. This was determined by comparing the number of diagnostic ions between the nanoFACT and nanoLC spectra and it was found that the nanoFACT spectra contained 19% or greater number of diagnostic ions for non-phosphorylated peptides and 55% or greater for phosphorylated peptides. For the glycosylation analysis, the glycosylation site of RNase B was fully characterized using 100 fmol of tryptic digest on a three-dimensional ion trap mass spectrometer.
[Poster No.14]
Increased coverage in the transmembrane domain with activated ion electron capture dissociation for top-down Fourier-transform mass spectrometry of integral membrane proteins
Vlad Zabrouskov1, Jennifer Zhang1, Julian P. Whitelegge2
1 Thermo Electron, 355 River Oaks Pkw, San Jose, California, CA 95132, 2 The Pasarow Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, The Departments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Chemistry and Biochemistry and The Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, The Molecular Biology Institute and The Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095. jpw@chem.ucla.edu
Top-down proteomics uses high-resolution Fourier-transform mass spectrometry (FT-MS) to characterize proteins with their intact masses, while additional dissociation experiments provide primary structure information for unambiguous identification and characterization of covalent modifications. It is essential that all segments of the proteome are addressed by this approach, including the integral membrane proteins of biological membrane bilayers that compartmentalize living cells and make up around one third of the proteome and an even greater proportion of drug targets. Membrane proteins present many technical challenges for biochemists in large part due to their physico-chemical properties which greatly limit their solubility and ionization efficiency. Presented here is a top down approach for efficient sequencing of transmembrane domains of the c-subunit of ATPH, an integral membrane protein from the thylakoid membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana. This small protein can be efficiently dissociated using collisionally activated dissociation (CAD); however its transmembrane helices do not show extensive fragmentation. Conventional electron capture dissociation (ECD) has worse efficiency than CAD, possibly due to the ATPH’s unfavorable conformation in the gas phase. However when the protein molecular ion is activated with IR laser during ECD, the fragmentation efficiency improves significantly, resulting in a 52% increase in coverage of transmembrane helices relative to CAD. This indicates that activated ion ECD is a powerful tool for the analysis of transmembrane domains of membrane proteins.
[Poster No.15]
Meeting
Attendees
LAST |
FIRST |
Email |
Adamczyk, |
Malgosia |
malada@ibb.waw.pl |
Amster, |
Jon |
jamster@uga.edu |
|
Jens |
jua@phys.au.dk |
Baba, |
Takashi |
baba@harl.hitachi.co.jp |
Baykut, |
Goekhan |
Goekhan.Baykut@bdal.de |
Beauchamp, |
Jack |
jlbchamp@caltech.edu |
Bruce, |
Jim |
james_bruce@wsu.edu |
Chan, |
Dominic |
twdchan@cuhk.edu.hk |
Chen, |
Jinzhi |
jzchen@fhcrc.org |
Cooper, |
Helen |
h.j.cooper@bham.ac.uk |
Costello, |
Cathy |
cecmsms@bu.edu |
Doneanu |
Catalin |
doneanu@u.washington.edu |
Fagerquist, |
|
cfagerquist@pw.usda.gov |
Gafken, |
Phil |
pgafken@fhcrc.org |
Gallis, |
Byron |
bgallis@u.washington.edu |
Goo, |
YoungAh |
youngah@u.washington.edu |
Goodlett, |
David |
Goodlett@u.washington.edu |
Hakansson, |
Kristina |
kicki@umich.edu |
Heeren, |
Ron |
heeren@amolf.nl |
Hengel, |
Shwna |
smhengel@u.washington.edu |
Horning, |
Stevan |
stevan.horning@thermo.com |
Hunt, |
Don |
dfh@virginia.edu |
Jones, |
Jace |
jwj2@u.washington.edu |
Kjeldsen, |
Frank |
Frank.Kjeldsen@bmms.uu.se |
kregenow, |
Floyd |
|
Langride-Smith, |
Pat |
poconnor@bu.edu |
LeTarte, |
Simon |
sletarte@systemsbiology.org |
Liu, |
Haichuan |
haichuan@umich.edu |
Loo, |
Joe |
jloo@chem.ucla.edu |
Loo, |
Rachel |
jloo@chem.ucla.edu |
Meeting
Attendees Cont’d
LAST |
FIRST |
Email |
McKay, |
|
lmackay@ed.ac.uk |
McLafferty, |
Fed |
fwm5@cornell.edu |
McLafferty, |
Tibby |
|
Mehl, |
John |
john_mehl@merck.com |
Muster, |
|
wayne.muster@ionspec.com |
Nielsen, |
Per |
pfn@novonordisk.com |
Nikolaev, |
Evgenij |
ennikolaev@rambler.ru |
O’Connor, |
Peter |
poconnor@bu.edu |
Pasa-Tolic, |
Ljiljana |
Ljiljana.pasatolic@pnl.gov |
Peter-Katalinic, |
Jasna |
jkp@uni-muenster.de |
Phanstiel, |
Doug |
dphansti@fhcrc.org |
Pikahari, |
Khatiana |
Katianna.Pihakari@ionspec.com |
Pitteri, |
|
spitteri@purdue.edu |
Renfrow, |
Matt |
renfrow@uab.edu |
Sadilek, |
Martin |
sadilek@u.washington.edu |
Scherl, |
Alex |
ascherl@u.washington.edu |
Shaffer, |
Scott |
sshaffer@u.washington.edu |
Simon, |
Jack |
simons@chemistry.chem.utah.edu |
Stacey, |
Catherine |
ccs@bdal.com |
Tang, |
Kai |
tangchen2004@yahoo.com |
|
Greg |
gktaylor@u.washington.edu |
Tsybin, |
Yury |
tsybin@magnet.fsu.edu |
Turecek, |
Franck |
turecek@chem.washington.edu |
Vaisar, |
Tomas |
tvaisar@u.washington.edu |
Wang, |
Tony |
tswang@u.washington.edu |
weidt, |
stefen |
s9905090@sms.ed.ac.uk |
Wheeler, |
Kevin |
Kevin.p.wheeler@thermo.com |
Williams |
|
boardmaa@advion.com |
Williams, |
Evans |
williams@cchem.berkeley.edu |
Witkowski, |
Ewa |
witkowsk@cgl.ucsf.edu |
Yates |
|
Sandy.Yates@Rice.edu |
Zubarev, |
Roman |
Roman.Zubarev@bmms.uu.se |
Zabrouskov, |
Vlad |
vlad.zabrouskov@thermo.com |